This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Legal Writing
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Articles
    • Awards and Remarks
    • Book Reviews
    • Essays
    • Introductions
    • Mastheads
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • FAQs
  • Resources
  • Join JLWI
  • search
  • X (formerly Twitter) (opens in a new tab)
  • Facebook (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:47279/feed
Articles
Vol. 2, 1996March 01, 1996 EDT

Critiquing Law Students’ Writing: What the Students Say Is Effective

Anne Enquist,
pedagogyassessmentfeedback
Photo by D A V I D S O N L U N A on Unsplash

Articles in Vol. 2, 1996

Vol. 2, 1996
  • Legal Writing in the Twenty-First Century: A Sharper Image
    Jill J. Ramsfield
  • Doctrine of the Last Antecedent: The Mystifying Morass of Ambiguous Modifiers
    Terri LeClercq
  • Greco-Roman Analysis of Metaphoric Reasoning
    Michael Frost
  • Critiquing Law Students' Writing: What the Students Say Is Effective
    Anne Enquist
  • Commenting on _The Language of Judges_, by Lawrence M. Solan
    Craig Hoffman
  • JLWI Editorial Board, Vol. 2
    JLWI
Legal Writing
Anne Enquist, Critiquing Law Students’ Writing: What the Students Say Is Effective, 2 Legal Writing 145 (1996).
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system